We're always looking for winning strategies. Here's one that is proving fruitful. In a nutshell, THIS STRATEGY USES THE SYSTEM TO BREAK THE SYSTEM, BY FINDING ERRORS. It could prove to be low cost, high impact - useful for far more than this case. Let me know what you think.
This is a feedback to the original article, but it makes it all the more suspicious that only paying readers can comment there, so by default, I am commenting here. No wonder comments are not exactly open, because the whole article looks like a complete misdirection.
The state "only" spends the taxpayer's money, so no large penalty deters it, unless someone can be made personally responsible, which never happens.
At court, even a case can come up only if the judge/grand jury accepts it, and nothing is admissible, without the judge's approval.
What are lawsuits good for in a system that favors the powerful?
When John Bolton was Head of the CIA, he visited the Head of the Organization for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons and quietly told him that 'we know where your children live'. Mr Budesda (?) stood up to him, but how many judges will?
This is a feedback to the original article, but it makes it all the more suspicious that only paying readers can comment there, so by default, I am commenting here. No wonder comments are not exactly open, because the whole article looks like a complete misdirection.
The state "only" spends the taxpayer's money, so no large penalty deters it, unless someone can be made personally responsible, which never happens.
At court, even a case can come up only if the judge/grand jury accepts it, and nothing is admissible, without the judge's approval.
What are lawsuits good for in a system that favors the powerful?
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-are-lawsuits-good-for
Using AI only trains the AI and helps construct a deepfake for the participant:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-does-chatgpt-work-what-is-chatgpt
When John Bolton was Head of the CIA, he visited the Head of the Organization for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons and quietly told him that 'we know where your children live'. Mr Budesda (?) stood up to him, but how many judges will?
Going after families seems to be part of the methods...