If you find out how to contact those new people, please let us know. I wonder if that’s the purpose of switching to Fresno. We must enlighten them. I’ll research too. I must say, Ed looks good. He must stay strong. They have nothing on him and are totally dependent on a confession and plea deal. It’s obvious they want to influence the public into believing they have a confession.
An electronic device permanent in his leg will provoke further health issues, this is ridiculous a senior citizen that needs to be in a wheelchair with an electronic device as he maybe decide to run away!? Of course I forgot he is a millionaire! He can pay someone to be taken overseas to evade the injustice 🤔 or maybe the leader if a gang with resources! This situation is to laugh, why is he wearing an electronic device? Of course perfect for lab rat testing... Thank you Elsa for continue this and try to be objective even if you may felt hurt! 🏆
I myself have sometimes written and posted things only to find upon reading them that what I've written seems illogical. Having noticed a similar occurrence here, I thought I'd ask Google "Why do people inadvertently write non-sequiturs?", which returned the following explanation:
"People inadvertently write non-sequiturs—statements or conclusions that do not logically follow from the preceding text—due to cognitive shortcuts, lapses in concentration, or miscommunication. Because the writer's internal thoughts jump rapidly, they sometimes fail to bridge the logical gap on the page for the reader..."
It's almost as though the two following, perhaps parallel, trains of thought had become awkwardly juxtaposed (especially while also having to watch and move one's fingers about the keyboard):
...maintained his innocence, and all the evidence confirms [ he did not start the fire. ]
One thing that's been on all our minds is the question of [ who *did* start the fire. ]
This was confirmed in many earlier posts. For instance, the fire he allegedly started scores 10 out of 10 for fires that could only have been started with directed energy. Here is a letter, where all the evidence is presented:
God love him, he is clearly innocent, and they clearly intend to hang this fire on him.
If you find out how to contact those new people, please let us know. I wonder if that’s the purpose of switching to Fresno. We must enlighten them. I’ll research too. I must say, Ed looks good. He must stay strong. They have nothing on him and are totally dependent on a confession and plea deal. It’s obvious they want to influence the public into believing they have a confession.
online info:
Judge Houry Sanderson
Houry A. Sanderson
Bar #: 131155
DEPT 53
559 457-6348
I have called and asked for her email address
assistant DA Gerard Egan
209-966-3626
gegan@mariposacounty.gov
Thanks so much Elsa!
They won't give out the email address, but call and they will give the address - don't have it here, but it is easy to get
An electronic device permanent in his leg will provoke further health issues, this is ridiculous a senior citizen that needs to be in a wheelchair with an electronic device as he maybe decide to run away!? Of course I forgot he is a millionaire! He can pay someone to be taken overseas to evade the injustice 🤔 or maybe the leader if a gang with resources! This situation is to laugh, why is he wearing an electronic device? Of course perfect for lab rat testing... Thank you Elsa for continue this and try to be objective even if you may felt hurt! 🏆
"........maintained his innocence, and all the evidence confirms he did start the fire." ??????
I myself have sometimes written and posted things only to find upon reading them that what I've written seems illogical. Having noticed a similar occurrence here, I thought I'd ask Google "Why do people inadvertently write non-sequiturs?", which returned the following explanation:
"People inadvertently write non-sequiturs—statements or conclusions that do not logically follow from the preceding text—due to cognitive shortcuts, lapses in concentration, or miscommunication. Because the writer's internal thoughts jump rapidly, they sometimes fail to bridge the logical gap on the page for the reader..."
It's almost as though the two following, perhaps parallel, trains of thought had become awkwardly juxtaposed (especially while also having to watch and move one's fingers about the keyboard):
...maintained his innocence, and all the evidence confirms [ he did not start the fire. ]
One thing that's been on all our minds is the question of [ who *did* start the fire. ]
The fire was started by directed energy. Who directed it? What exact person had the machinery? That I don't know.
YIKES!!!! I have now noticed my error, and fixed it. All the evidence confirms he did NOt start the fire.
This was confirmed in many earlier posts. For instance, the fire he allegedly started scores 10 out of 10 for fires that could only have been started with directed energy. Here is a letter, where all the evidence is presented:
https://truthsummit.substack.com/p/ed-wackermans-lawyer-receives-letter
Thank you for the update. I see he’s not out of the woods.
Not at all. One thing I note: 2 new people who I am sure do not have much info.