UPDATE. DAY 9, PART 2, of Reiner Fuellmich's trial. By Jiota and Alkmini, Telegram channel @wearegreekja
Today Reiner’s trial resumed. It was certainly very different from the prevIous days. It was revealed shortly before the lunch break, that a criminal complaint has been filed against Mr. John, the public prosecutor. And the defense has also requested his removal from office. Here is the full report from Part i of Day 9.
In the second part of Day 9, there is nothing equally stunning.
02.04.2024 published on TelegramChannel wearegreeeks
Wε αrε Grεεεκ - what's your Superpower ?, [02.04.2024 12:56]
Lunch break
The request to interrupt the main hearing until tomorrow was not granted, as the applications could also be submitted later.
The trial was continued with the statement by attorney Antonia Fischer, which did not prove to be spectacular in that she essentially repeated everything and presented it as Dr. Justus Hoffmann had done in his statement.
After the lunch break, the trial will continue with the questioning of the witness Antonia Fischer. Κάλη όρεξη! 😋
@wearegreeekja
Wε αrε Grεεεκ - what's your superpower ?, [02.04.2024 16:48]
Didn't turn out so funny after all.
Part 1
The defense was finally able to ask questions, with Reiner Füllmich dominating.
He formulated his questions very clearly and in detail. Antonia Fischer looked as if she had "got into a muddle" with some of the questions and was unable to answer many of them clearly, directly or specifically.During the questioning, Antonia Fischer needed reminders, even when she referred to her own minutes from the shareholders' meeting in November 2022. She therefore needed a reminder of what she herself had once written about.
In the end, she was asked about the class action and how she would assess it, since Marcel Templin had transferred the EUR 600,000 from the client's funds to the bank and, as a private individual, had the land charge on Füllmich's house registered and not on behalf of the community of interests, for which he actually wanted to have acted.What is her opinion on what these funds are? Private or his client's money?
She replied that this was disputed.
It became clear that she herself did not understand how the class action worked, but always pretended to know.
Füllmich asks: "Why did you, because you were so afraid of tax debts, prevent the company from being registered at the shareholders' meeting, to which you also brought your own tax advisor, Jörn Böttcher?"
@wearegreeekja
Wε αrε Grεεεκ - what's your superpower ?, [02.04.2024 16:57]
Didn't turn out so funny after all.
Part 2
During the questioning, Antonia Fischer could no longer avoid admitting that she and Dr. Justus Hoffmann were aware of the problems at the base and on the board (Viviane Fischer and Reiner Füllmich in the dual leadership), i.e. also with regard to the tax consultant Böttcher. Füllmich wanted to know why they had not resorted to another tax consultant. Antonia Fischer did not want to answer this question.
It is clear that the aim was not to reach an amicable agreement or to settle any tax debts. Rather, everything was done to prevent the money from being repaid a month and a half after the house sale, which they knew was going to take place and had taken place, and that Reiner Füllmich was willing to pay back the money for the loan.
Why didn't she take the civil action route? "Because Reiner would have absconded, or there was a risk!" Antonia Fischer claimed.
Attorney Katja Wörmer then argues that until a month ago, Reiner Füllmich had a running law firm in Göttingen, with a large house and an apartment above it and a local residence, plus his ranch in the USA.
The suspicion that there was collusion can only be seen as corroborated.
wearegreeekja
_________________________________
The current court dates:
Tuesday, 02.04.2024 Start: 09.15 a.m.
Wednesday, 03.04.2024 Start: 09.15 a.m.
Friday, 19.04.2024 Start: 09.15 a.m.
Wednesday, 24.04.2024 Start: 09.15 a.m.
4 more added, ending approximately May 15
_________________________________
Here is the address to write to Reiner:
LETTERS;
JVA Rosdorf
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
Am Grossen Sieke 8
37124 Rosdorf
Germany
postcards and cards allowed,
no glitter on the envelops,
no stamps or money in the envelops,
no books or other objects - not permitted,
nothing to be mentioned about the case,
put your name of each page of the letter - letters are taken out of the envelops.
_________________________________
TO DONATE:
To donate, here is the link for donations for legal and other expenses: https://www.givesendgo.com/GBBX2
Posted March 19, 2024
So Reiner was not allowed to repay his loan, because his accusers feared he might not?
Then their fear (for which there is what evidence that it was well founded?) is to be the basis of Reiner's conviction?
And these accusers take into their own hands not only the Corona Committee's funds, but appropriate Reiner's private funds too, so that not only can Reiner not repay the loan with the Corona Committee portion of his house sale proceeds, but cannot do so with the balance - his own liquid funds - either.
And this dark situation is created in conjunction with or at the behest of the public prosecutor, John.
The reports from the trial paint a picture of very confused prosecution witnesses who not only cannot maintain coherent stories, but are unable to give full and frank accounts of their actions due to various personal issues.
What exactly has been the relationship between the prosecution witnesses and the public prosecutor? Does it amount to a criminal conspiracy?
I just thought that I would make the point that if Reiner is receiving his mail "unopened" .. it says that someone inside the prison system has decided that is the right thing to do .. maybe a special internal signal of support!