14 Comments
User's avatar
Gecko1's avatar

Here's the best general truth documentary on 911, made by a Canadian guy:- https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AQhO4PlwapE&pp=QACIAgHSBwkJ_ACjtWo3m0M%3D&rco=1

Expand full comment
John Sinclair's avatar

Bibi Satanyahu:"We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, and the American "struggle" in Iraq, these events swung American public opinion in our favour." Just like the attack on the USS Liberty in 1967 the attacks on 9/11 lead all the way to Israel. It was no coincidence that the owner of the Twin Towers Larry Silverstein just happened to be away from his office in the Twin Towers on the day of the attack.

Expand full comment
Amy Harlib's avatar

BEST INFO AND SPECULATION ABOUT 9/11 IS BY DAVID A. HUGHES THE 'OMNIWAR' GUY AT HIS SUBSTACK INCLUDING A MUST-SEE ABOUT JUDY WOOD. https://dhughes.substack.com/t/911

I am a Native New Yorker who lived through that 9/11 day and as it was happening, knew it was a false flag psy-ops because the air force never scrambled and of course for a lot of other reasons but that was the first thing I thought of.

Expand full comment
Art's avatar

David A. Hughes also describes the "keepers of the numerous official conspiracy theories" as Group 2 gatekeepers and are often highly popular and promoted in Alt Media.

Expand full comment
Elsa's avatar

Yes, exactly.

Expand full comment
Chris Coles FRSA's avatar

I was in Washington DC September 11th 2001, and watched the entire episode on TV in my hotel room, not very far from the White House. Later that day was shocked to discover that the entire population of the centre of DC surrounding the White House had been evacuated. Again, as the then holder of US patents for the camera phone combined with GPS, I attended every telecom related conference immediately following, so I had a fully detailed briefing on the consequences to all the buildings involved. Again, being familiar with heat treatment of steel by dipping components into molten salt baths, and the well known explosive consequences of water coming into contact with such molten liquids, I have come to believe that the later work detailing the flow of molten aluminium from the burning aircraft, that hit the twin towers, coming into contact with the water flow from the water tanks at the top of the towers being the primary cause of the destruction of the surrounding structures leading to the collapse of the towers.

Sudden creation of super heated steam within a mass of molten aluminium, is extremely explosive, and is to my understanding, the primary reason for the collapse of the towers..

Expand full comment
Conspiracy Theorista's avatar

There is zero evidence for this "super-heated steam" and DEFINITELY none for a mass of molten aluminum.

Expand full comment
Gecko1's avatar

Lol, exactly. 500,000 tons of steel and concrete doesn't just turn to fine dust from a kinetic collision or an isolated combustion event.

Expand full comment
Elsa's avatar

IYou clearly have much expertise suggest you read Where Did the Towers Go? One thing that springs to mind is information on the basins that, if cracked, would have led to massive flooding of core New York. Judy Wood's explanation answers why the basin did not crack. Most, I suggest you look at her view - even if only to show how your explanation is superior. For example, it is generally held that no airplanes were involved.

Expand full comment
Chris Coles FRSA's avatar

All I can, and will add; is that I watched the second aircraft arrive to hit the second tower, in real time, including the engine components arriving on the street below, am a aircraft pilot, mostly gliders, but very familiar with commercial aircraft being once a Grade One Aerospace Development Fitter, so anyone trying to say there were no aircraft involved . . . . . I'm too polite to add anything further.

Expand full comment
Elsa's avatar

I have read several analyses of why aircrafts could not have enough to get the towers to "dustify." It related to the strength of the structures.

Expand full comment
Chris Coles FRSA's avatar

My understanding was that the weak point was the bolts used to hold the entire structure together; that they failed under the stress and set into motion a cascade of failures. Add the weight of the five stories above and the structure, once the structure started to collapse, it became unstoppable. A sort of Titanic problem, that the bolts were not specified to take the additional stresses involved.

Expand full comment
Gecko1's avatar

Lol, the bolts are made of hardened steel and are stronger than the steel beams they hold together.

Expand full comment
Chris Coles FRSA's avatar

Direct reference please.

Expand full comment