8 Comments

My impression from the reporting of day 20 of this political witch hunt has been - that the assassination attempt on Donald Trump by his political adversaries in America - has CHANGED the course of that FAKE-trial of Dr. Reiner Füllmich in Germany as well.

.

Up till now my overall impression was the CRIMINAL intention of that insane court to spread out everything as long as possible - not at all to find justice - but entirely dictated from "above" to KEEP DR. REINER FÜLLMICH OUT OFF THE CORONA-BIO-TERROR CLEARING UP, THAT HAS STARTED GLOBALLY!

.

Now it seems to me, that this FAKE German "NAZI"-court - reminding then entire planet of Roland Freisler's criminal show-trials for Adolf Hitler & his criminal Government - has changed course on orders from "above" again, and this time tries to find it's way out of this misery it created in the first place, to suffocate the truth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_Freisler.

.

I am very confident - this highly criminal witch hunt & disastrous FAKE-trial of our very best CORONA-CRIME-DETECTIVE - will come to an end very soon!

(Do not forget: Michael Ballweg was held on comparable FAKE-charges as well for long nine month WITHOUT any valuable evidence in this rotten to the core German Justice system!)

Expand full comment

What exactly does this part mean? "Attorney Wörmer then filed a motion for recusal against all members of the chamber after questioning whether the entire chamber was responsible for the rejection of the motions for evidence. She was given until July 22, 2024 to submit a written statement of reasons for the motion." Is Reiner's lawyer looking for another Judge to continue with his case? This last update doesn't sound positive at all, or am I misunderstanding how I have read the Substack?

Expand full comment
author

Reiner and his team are saying - with excellent reason - that the current judges have shown partiality and therefor should remove themselves from the case. Katja Woermer has until today to file her reasons for her asking for the recusal of the judges. In that case, yes, another judge - hopefully less partial - would take over.

Expand full comment

Thank you for explaining Elsa. Let us hope and pray for someone who is fair and who will see the facts for what they are and release Reiner!

Expand full comment
author

I'm sure the person could give a good face-saving reason.

Expand full comment
author

Yes, someone with integrity and courage.

Expand full comment

So if I understand correctly, the case was prosecuted on the basis of theft of Corona Committee monies via false loan agreements. The defence rebutted the prosecution case both in law and on the facts including discrediting the prosecution witnesses.

To avoid finding no case to answer and further prosecution embarrassment, the court halted the case before the defence could call its own witnesses and declared the defendant guilty of a previously unargued breach of fiduciary duty, complaining the defendant had no right to take action to protect Corona Committee monies from possible arbitrary seizure by the state.

Despite longstanding defence accusations of wrongful interference by state agencies in the prosecution and possible political and state agency pressures applied to the judges, the court seems set on refusing to allow the defence to bring forward any evidence either in relation to the supposed new basis of conviction or in relation to the corruption and bias of the judicial process.

The lack of due process in the case has from the outset indicated a biased and political prosecution, endorsed by the court. Reiner has already spent nine months in prison and is now faced with a wrongful conviction.

It is vital Reiner and his team publicise every aspect of the case and ensure the facts and arguments are kept fully in the public domain, especially if they are not allowed to put these to the public in court.

It is still possible for the case against him to collapse, because by its arbitrary decisions, its partiality, and failing to observe due process, the court has pretty well lost its legitimacy and moral authority and is shaming the German justice system.

Expand full comment
author

Absolutely: "It is vital Reiner and his team publicise every aspect of the case . . . " Yes, so very important because " the court has pretty well lost its legitimacy and moral authority and is shaming the German justice system." A great message to send out!!

Expand full comment