Recently Ed Wackerman's legal team frightened him, told him there would be a Grand Jury, not an indictment. It would be behind closed doors. He would not see his accusers.
Check out our new website we are buiding to Alert about the Weather Warfare and DEW attacks. Protectandalert.org.
And this is a homemade video from our committee members of her recent investigation of the Chemical Lake Fire outside of Spokane WA 8 months after it and what they found, The evidence of these DEW attacks is still there. And still there in Mariposa where someone could show the authorities. In plain site. People are so brainwashed they are not believing their eyes or have the common sense to know that the forest burns UP in a forest fire. Look at the Halloween like trees and there is a hole in the ground in WA still burning after 8+ months!! It appears that the ground cooks- the radiation is attracted to water and metal, just like electricity - kind of the same physics. And there is both water and natural metals in soils. That is why the 'flames' are so high in the sky the air and what ever they chemtrailed first, is ' on fire' but a radiation fire- not anything organic burning.. you have to think microwave physics- plasma is involved as well very possibly. Once the radiation fires peter out, what is left are trees dead, but still intact. And the ground around them in circles after 8 months later is not growing a weed. The soil must be too radiated and damaged to grow anything. Think about the million acres in Texas important grasslands zapped, 10,000 head of cattle cooked- their lips were bubbling and had to be shot, Not burnt- radiated , there was no grass to burn really it was all chewed to the dirt, winter, had just snowed! Not exactly fire season. The soil seems to cook. as does the moisture mixed with whatever accelerants sprayed. Check out : https://rumble.com/v517owo-an-investigation-of-the-aftermath-of-the.-chemical-lake-fire-outside-of-spo.html
Elsa, Ed Wakerman is accused of 16 counts of arson, has not been allowed to be free even though he is has not been proven guilty of a crime. He is being seriously framed. And no offense, but you are very incorrect about Grand Juries in the United States where you are not. Grand Juries almost ALWAYS Indict. Unlike a preliminary hearing held in court with the defense side present, the grand jury doesn't make its decision in the context of an adversary proceeding. Rather, it's a one-sided affair.
Grand jurors see and hear only what prosecutors put before them. (While prosecutors technically have an obligation to present "exculpatory" evidence—evidence that suggests that a defendant might not be guilty—there's not much other than the prosecutor's conscience to enforce this rule.) During a preliminary hearing, the defendant can also see and cross-examine prosecution witnesses, which gives them a good preview of the prosecution's case. This situation doesn't present itself in the context of a grand jury.
Grand Juries Often Return an Indictment In part because there's no one on the "other side" to contest the prosecutor's evidence, grand juries almost always return an indictment as requested by the prosecutor. According to a U.S. Department of Justice study, "Grand juries are notorious for being ‘rubberstamps' for the prosecutor for virtually all routine criminal matters." (McDonald, William F., Plea Bargaining: Critical Issues and Common Practices (1985).) It's also suggested that grand juries rubber stamp prosecutors' charges because grand jurors are not adept at evaluating evidence like judges are—making it easier to convince a grand jury than a judge that the defendant should stand for trial.
Grand Jury Proceedings Are Secret-
Prosecutors often prefer grand juries because the proceedings are secret, whereas preliminary hearings are open to the public. The rule on secrecy is meant to provide several benefits. For the accused, it protects their reputation should no charges issue. For witnesses, it's meant to allow them to testify more freely and truthfully. And for the prosecution, it provides control of information. But critics of secrecy rules say it runs counter to the fairness and transparency of the justice system.
AT A HEARING ED WOULD BE ABLE TO FACE HIS ACCUSERS, AT A GRAND JURY HE CAN NOT. This is part of the framing of Ed Wakerman to use a Grand Jury . He deserves a hearing with witnesses and his defending attorney. His attorney is no good or he would have deposed Robert Brame. Who has now quit helping Ed Wakerman.
There is no one defending Ed at a Grand Jury- its all about evidence against him, and nothing else. And it's all in secret. ED HAS EVERY REASON TO FEAR THE FUCKING GRAND JURY! He is going away for life. The Grand Jury will only see what is shown to them- evidence against him, No one will be speaking up for him. The Grand Jury experience alone could give him a stroke. I pray his daughter or someone will be there with him.
Now the FBI is in New Mexico at the latest terrorist attack and are probably lookiing for another person to frame. It must STOP there, so please take action to let Rudisio New Mexico know it was a Terrorist attack. We are in touch with a local resident there, and trees not burnt up,melted glass, same signature of a DEW... she said people are calling it ' another Maui'.
Not sure that your address is correct for Ed. He is in a detention center in California. Mariposa County would make sense but Longview, Texas does not. ????
This is info from Ed: All mail for US correction facilities now goes through the Texas address, where the mail is scanned and sent to the tablet of the prisoner. In other words, they no longer get the physical mail. Nothing to touch, to hold. Instead, something on the tablet, whether card or letter.
Send Robert Brame's video interviews to podcasters like Tucker Carlson, Glen Greenwald, Kim Iversen, Maria Zeee, InfoWars, Redacted, Jane Ruby, Stew Peters and more asking them to interview Robert and tell them about Ed and now New Mexico. I do this a lot, but if more people do maybe Robert can get interviewed by these top reporters with huge followings. New Mexico is our latest attack they still do not have much internet. We need to really wake up Ruidoso New Mexico to what really just happened to them, so they can demand Justice for it from the FBI who are there now . Please contact them, we sent an email already, please do as well so it can stop there and not zapp our homes: https://www.ruidoso-nm.gov
Good idea and its about to happen again at our latest terrorist DEW attack in New Mexico. The FBI are crawling there like cockroaches looking for someone to frame. Hundreds of fires are burning right now, we are under a serious attack. How many are DEWs? I bet most are there is not much reason for them otherwise. We have to look each one up and look for the signatures- melted glass, trees dead but intact... Here is a map showing fires in our country: https://datacentral.kitsapsun.com/fires/
Check out our new website we are buiding to Alert about the Weather Warfare and DEW attacks. Protectandalert.org.
And this is a homemade video from our committee members of her recent investigation of the Chemical Lake Fire outside of Spokane WA 8 months after it and what they found, The evidence of these DEW attacks is still there. And still there in Mariposa where someone could show the authorities. In plain site. People are so brainwashed they are not believing their eyes or have the common sense to know that the forest burns UP in a forest fire. Look at the Halloween like trees and there is a hole in the ground in WA still burning after 8+ months!! It appears that the ground cooks- the radiation is attracted to water and metal, just like electricity - kind of the same physics. And there is both water and natural metals in soils. That is why the 'flames' are so high in the sky the air and what ever they chemtrailed first, is ' on fire' but a radiation fire- not anything organic burning.. you have to think microwave physics- plasma is involved as well very possibly. Once the radiation fires peter out, what is left are trees dead, but still intact. And the ground around them in circles after 8 months later is not growing a weed. The soil must be too radiated and damaged to grow anything. Think about the million acres in Texas important grasslands zapped, 10,000 head of cattle cooked- their lips were bubbling and had to be shot, Not burnt- radiated , there was no grass to burn really it was all chewed to the dirt, winter, had just snowed! Not exactly fire season. The soil seems to cook. as does the moisture mixed with whatever accelerants sprayed. Check out : https://rumble.com/v517owo-an-investigation-of-the-aftermath-of-the.-chemical-lake-fire-outside-of-spo.html
Elsa, Ed Wakerman is accused of 16 counts of arson, has not been allowed to be free even though he is has not been proven guilty of a crime. He is being seriously framed. And no offense, but you are very incorrect about Grand Juries in the United States where you are not. Grand Juries almost ALWAYS Indict. Unlike a preliminary hearing held in court with the defense side present, the grand jury doesn't make its decision in the context of an adversary proceeding. Rather, it's a one-sided affair.
Grand jurors see and hear only what prosecutors put before them. (While prosecutors technically have an obligation to present "exculpatory" evidence—evidence that suggests that a defendant might not be guilty—there's not much other than the prosecutor's conscience to enforce this rule.) During a preliminary hearing, the defendant can also see and cross-examine prosecution witnesses, which gives them a good preview of the prosecution's case. This situation doesn't present itself in the context of a grand jury.
Grand Juries Often Return an Indictment In part because there's no one on the "other side" to contest the prosecutor's evidence, grand juries almost always return an indictment as requested by the prosecutor. According to a U.S. Department of Justice study, "Grand juries are notorious for being ‘rubberstamps' for the prosecutor for virtually all routine criminal matters." (McDonald, William F., Plea Bargaining: Critical Issues and Common Practices (1985).) It's also suggested that grand juries rubber stamp prosecutors' charges because grand jurors are not adept at evaluating evidence like judges are—making it easier to convince a grand jury than a judge that the defendant should stand for trial.
Grand Jury Proceedings Are Secret-
Prosecutors often prefer grand juries because the proceedings are secret, whereas preliminary hearings are open to the public. The rule on secrecy is meant to provide several benefits. For the accused, it protects their reputation should no charges issue. For witnesses, it's meant to allow them to testify more freely and truthfully. And for the prosecution, it provides control of information. But critics of secrecy rules say it runs counter to the fairness and transparency of the justice system.
AT A HEARING ED WOULD BE ABLE TO FACE HIS ACCUSERS, AT A GRAND JURY HE CAN NOT. This is part of the framing of Ed Wakerman to use a Grand Jury . He deserves a hearing with witnesses and his defending attorney. His attorney is no good or he would have deposed Robert Brame. Who has now quit helping Ed Wakerman.
There is no one defending Ed at a Grand Jury- its all about evidence against him, and nothing else. And it's all in secret. ED HAS EVERY REASON TO FEAR THE FUCKING GRAND JURY! He is going away for life. The Grand Jury will only see what is shown to them- evidence against him, No one will be speaking up for him. The Grand Jury experience alone could give him a stroke. I pray his daughter or someone will be there with him.
Now the FBI is in New Mexico at the latest terrorist attack and are probably lookiing for another person to frame. It must STOP there, so please take action to let Rudisio New Mexico know it was a Terrorist attack. We are in touch with a local resident there, and trees not burnt up,melted glass, same signature of a DEW... she said people are calling it ' another Maui'.
Not sure that your address is correct for Ed. He is in a detention center in California. Mariposa County would make sense but Longview, Texas does not. ????
This is info from Ed: All mail for US correction facilities now goes through the Texas address, where the mail is scanned and sent to the tablet of the prisoner. In other words, they no longer get the physical mail. Nothing to touch, to hold. Instead, something on the tablet, whether card or letter.
I feel soooo bad for Ed =(
Thank you for keeping us informed on this matter, Elsa
What to do is a big question for me. My thought: a book, to publicize his case. FRAMED: THE STORY OF ED WACKERMAN, INNOCENT.
Send Robert Brame's video interviews to podcasters like Tucker Carlson, Glen Greenwald, Kim Iversen, Maria Zeee, InfoWars, Redacted, Jane Ruby, Stew Peters and more asking them to interview Robert and tell them about Ed and now New Mexico. I do this a lot, but if more people do maybe Robert can get interviewed by these top reporters with huge followings. New Mexico is our latest attack they still do not have much internet. We need to really wake up Ruidoso New Mexico to what really just happened to them, so they can demand Justice for it from the FBI who are there now . Please contact them, we sent an email already, please do as well so it can stop there and not zapp our homes: https://www.ruidoso-nm.gov
Good idea and its about to happen again at our latest terrorist DEW attack in New Mexico. The FBI are crawling there like cockroaches looking for someone to frame. Hundreds of fires are burning right now, we are under a serious attack. How many are DEWs? I bet most are there is not much reason for them otherwise. We have to look each one up and look for the signatures- melted glass, trees dead but intact... Here is a map showing fires in our country: https://datacentral.kitsapsun.com/fires/
🤯