UPDATE. DAY 13, PARTS 1 AND 2, of Reiner Fuellmich's trial. DEVASTATING POSSIBILITIES.
I got disturbing comments yesterday, that Reiner had left himself open to being convicted, as the testimony he gave is against German case law. - it shows that, according to such case law, he did not intend to repay. I passed on the comments to both Inka and Katja Woermer. But that was very late in the day.
Today the comments, which I was tempted to dismiss as totally unfounded in reality, proved to be in line with reality - a devastating reality.
Here is the most recent update, sent first by a friend who did a quick deepl translation, and then by another friend who sent a second translation:
Here is the update. Day 13. Part 1.
Wε αrε Grεεκ - what's your Superpower ?, [03.05.2024 09:18]
May 3, 2024
13th day of trial in the case of Dr. Reiner Füllmich before the Göttingen Regional Court
Göttingen/Corfu/Athens/Northern Germany
This is an account of Jiota's personal impressions and feelings. She has reproduced what she heard in the sessions as she personally understood it, and she does not claim to know all the connections and legal details or the whole truth. This report must not be taken out of context!
Jiota's audio is immediately formulated and reproduced by Alkmini in text form as a “water level report”, i.e. short and to the point. Synchronously, Socrates sets to work translating the texts into Greek.Dr. Reiner Füllmich has many interested comrades-in-arms in Greece, as is well known. At the end of the trial day, StreamPunk takes over and creates a video in which the day's proceedings are recounted in detail.
@SokratesTvHellas
@StreamPunk
@wearegreeekja
Wε αrε Grεεεκ - what's your Superpower ?, [03.05.2024 13:07] Short report part 1
Short report part 1
Car and other mishaps
Today StA John was present without the support of the Chief Public Prosecutor. Justus Hoffmann and Viviane Fischer were not present.
Defense counsel Dr. Miseré was late due to a car breakdown. Tobias Weissenborn was questioned again in detail on today's trial day. He answered the questions put to him in the same detailed and extremely confident manner as during the last questioning. There were additions, namely he was explicitly asked about his perception of the class action and the terminations of mandates. At the time, clients had terminated their mandates due to the data leak and transferred their matters, or powers of attorney, to Reiner Füllmich. This means that he was instructed to reclaim the client's money. Marcel Templin no longer had any legal right to act as the representative of the community of interests in this respect, as this was also the formal legal responsibility of Reiner Füllmich.
Weissenborn made his statement meticulously and in detail, enriched with expert legal explanations.
Templin's actions were legally questionable, said Weissenborn.
They should have filed a complaint and informed the bar association, he continued.
Füllmich had always relied on communication or the settlement route, i.e. ultimately on an amicable agreement. He was under an illusion; he wanted to avoid trouble or declaratory actions.
Regarding the loans, Weissenborn says that they could of course be utilized, as they all had sole power of representation.
Weissenborn confirmed Reiner Füllmich's statements and was an exonerating witness.
Finally, the chairman read out the preliminary legal assessment of the case, which can only be regarded as devastating.
@SokratesTvHellas
@StreamPunk @wearegreeekja
Wε αrε Grεεκ - what's your Superpower ?, [03.05.2024 13:40] Short report part 2
Temporary state of shock
Everyone in the room seemed shocked, the remarks almost brutal.
It was as if every attempt was being made to construct what the witness statements did not reveal. The loan agreements were interpreted as concealed loan agreements, which primarily represented a fiduciary asset management. The chamber thus considered it proven that Füllmich had acted unlawfully.
The viewer was confronted with a completely original interpretation of the law. Antonia Fischer and Justus Hoffmann, as co-partners, should always have been informed. Furthermore, it was no longer assumed that Reiner Füllmich and Viviane Fischer had colluded.
In plain language, this means that Viviane Fischer would now be completely exonerated. (Note: this is still a preliminary legal assessment!)
She would not be seen by the chamber as someone who had done something wrong.
Attorney Dr. Miseré filed a motion for the chamber's legal assessment,
as the defense has a completely different legal opinion. A transcript of this will follow later with the consent of the defense.Miseré also stated that he assumed that the proceedings were politicized, which could be interpreted from the fact that Reiner Füllmich was illegally brought from Mexico to Germany.
Despite the exonerating witnesses, who gave detailed, expert and credible testimony, the Chamber made this preliminary legal assessment.
In addition, further dates beyond 15.05.2024 until July were scheduled in the event that the defense wishes to submit further motions for evidence - witnesses.
The chamber made it clear that it was no longer necessary to hear further witnesses.@SokratesTvHellas @StreamPunk @wearegreeekja
I have received a further comment on this devastating legal assessment.
Today, the court did exactly what I had predicted: they ruled that Reiner did not intend to pay back the money, and that the transfer of the mortgage by the bank to Templin was legal, based on what the witnesses testified, statements made by the bank AND Reiner’s own account. I called it, but y'all didn't want to listen. As it turns out, Tobias Weissenborn is behind many of the faulty legal advice that lead to Reiner being where he is now. You focused too much on "the other side" that you failed to consider that there might be traitors on his side. Keep you friends close, but your enemies closer.
posted on: https://truthsummit.substack.com/p/major-update-reiner-fuellmich-april-29
From The confident tone of Tobias Weissenborn, I do not conclude that he is a traitor within. He seems to have been instead unaware of German case law (which I could not believe myself when I got messages about it yesterday).
_________________________________
FURTHER COURT DATES:
No dates at the moment, but further dates beyond 15.05.2024 until July were scheduled
_________________________________
Here is the address to write to Reiner:
LETTERS;
JVA Rosdorf
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
Am Grossen Sieke 8
37124 Rosdorf
Germany
postcards and cards allowed,
no glitter on the envelops,
no stamps or money in the envelops,
no books or other objects - not permitted,
nothing to be mentioned about the case,
put your name of each page of the letter - letters are taken out of the envelops.
_________________________________
TO DONATE:
To donate, here is the link for donations for legal and other expenses: https://www.givesendgo.com/GBBX2
Posted May 3 2024
I am in total confusion! This all seems like a drastic turn of events. I was under the impression that Reiner’s defense was proceeding well and that he would be exonerated. What does this ultimately mean for Reiner? Will he be found guilty and remain in prison? And what about the threats made to the presiding judges and Reiner’s Attorney Misere; Isn’t that further proof that German intelligence just wanted to take Reiner down. I’m going to have to read through everything and all the comments to try to gain a better understanding.
I am not a lawyer and I am not familiar with German law. I am summarizing my understanding of this situation, to attempt to make sense of it in my own mind.
Rainer was blacklisted by the German authorities (as was now exposed officially in court). The prosecutor colluded with members of the CC. A conspiracy for which the Prosecutor will hopefully be taken to task, meaning to court!
Rainer got lured into and arrested illegally in the German Embassy in Mexico and deported to a German jail.
Reiner is or was part of the Corona Committee. If he is not anymore, who had the right to kick him out (I know they did, but did they have any legal standing to do so)? I still don’t understand what the legal structure of this committee actually is. Was it ever properly established? Whatever it was, wasn’t it supposed to be changed to something else, but VF dragged her feet in the process? So, what was the legal foundation of the committee? Meaning, to what legal entity did people contribute money to? They obviously contributed for the CC for do do their investigative work. But did anybody who sent money care about the legal structure of the CC? I doubt it. In these crazy times, people saw a savior in Reiner, and hoped to contribute to uncovering the myriad of crimes committed by the authorities through him (no one else in the CC truly did so!) exposing them in the extensive interviews he conducted with specialists and whistleblowers from various areas.
Obviously to all, the heavy lifting was done by Reiner. VF was a rather weird co-host. The other two, AF and JH, weren’t fully there even when they deigned to attend a meeting, which was rare enough.
Who of those four, if any, has any legal right to that money? That the CC would use the funds to pay for operational expenses should be obvious. And that VF’s lover’s company received a sizeable junk thereof was exposed in the court hearings.
Answering the myriad of emails the CC must have gotten should be remunerated, this should be obvious too, especially since there were funds to do so. Therefore, if Reiner’s law firm took over that job from VF, who seemingly didn’t perform very well on that front either, then his law firm ought to have been paid for it.
That money of any organization working for the “opposition” of the political agenda was in jeopardy is also obvious and we have plenty of cases from around the world showing bank accounts being closed or frozen (aka the money being stolen). Removing the funds from the bank accounts was the only reasonable thing to do, especially since several of the CC’s accounts were closed by the respective banks anyway, from what I understand.
What to do with the funds?
Cryptocurrency account: too risky, because of 1) massive fluctuation, 2) the lawmakers doing their best to make cryptos difficult to access, or illegal, or whatever else they can do to disrupt this alternative mode of payment; 3) too easy to lose a lot of money, if not everything
Metals (gold and silver): Seem the best option. Pretty stable, trend going up, can be kept in a safe, can be liquidated when needed.
Using donated money for personal purposes, like a home upgrade:
I don’t know, because I don’t know who this money belonged to, and for what purposes it could legally be used! Has that been established? It does make sense from the point of view of keeping the money safe from governmental overreach. If the legal entity in whose name the money was sent allows for that, or the people representing the legal entity, then there should be no problem.
However, the problem arises that only Reiner was kidnapped and imprisoned, even though VF also took money from the CC for personal use/safe keeping. Therefore it was either illegal to do so, which means she should be in jail too – though probably not under the criminal law, since nobody was hurt by either of them safekeeping some of the money privately – or it was not illegal, hence Reiner should never have been arrested in the first place.
But VF was just exonerated from any wrong doings by the judge, wasn’t she? How is that legally possible? Both Reiner and VF did the same thing – only the amounts differ. I can only see a politically motivated witch hunt going on here, and nothing that is in any way motivated by the law (whatever this means these days…), or by people being hurt by someone’s/Reiner’s actions!
However, there is a real crime that quite obviously has been committed: the theft of the money from the sale of Reiner’s house. How can it possibly be legally transferred to a person whose name is not on the mortgage or the legal title? MT was not part of the CC (or was he?, he does not represent the CC and he has no more right than me or you to Reiner’s money. Even if the was part of the CC and he had the right to take the money back and put it in a bank account of the CC, how could he possibly do so legally without the home owner's/Reiner's consent? Moreover, were he a legal representative of the CC, would only be entitled to the amount from the CC, not the whole amount of the sale! And that amount would have to be put into an account of the CC, not in his personal bank account! Am I getting this wrong? If not, why is MT not sitting in court yet, in handcuffs? After all, he has actually harmed somebody: Reiner Fuellmich!