Hi, all, I have sent Elsa this powerful 4-page critical response regarding the discredited theory of the destruction of the World Trade Center by directed energy weapons, but it doesn’t appear that she read it. I hope you will:
Of course, there are directed energy weapons. But there is absolutely no evidence, including in the book by Judy Wood, that the towers were destroyed by it. Read the above paper if you want to understand why I refer to the DEW hypothesis, as “fantasy“.
This documentary that I made at AE911Truth, from beginning to end, for a detailed, factual, accounting of the forensic evidence of high energy, explosives, extreme heat, and nanothermite incendiaries, and how exactly they account for the towers’ destruction. Judy Wood, on page 126 and surrounding pages of her book, specifically denies each of the above points of evidence, even though they are irrefutable an overwhelming. Given that, there is plenty of reason to suspect her intentions. Follow the evidence, not the fantasy:
Oh, Elsa, I so appreciate, not only the Truth Summit that you initiated and conducted, but also this message you now posted. I completely understand what your experience has been and I find myself completely aligned with what you're saying.
As I mentioned before, your interview with Andrew Johnson was amazing for me to hear; eye-opening and life-changing.
I hope many people become aware of the evidence of directed free-energy technology.
Thank you so much again!!
If I may post two items that I've since connected (indirectly) to Dr. Judy Wood's research. That would be this about the recent earthquake in Turkey:
And this man's experience working as a contractor for Raytheon at the South Pole ( one must get through the beginning of his presentation to arrive at the importance of what he reveals)
My take on the 2 men is that they need to remember that we are fighting a common enemy. That even though their "truths" are vastly different there is a common truth! The official narrative as a lie.
Agreed. The energy is better directed at the common enemy. The facts do matter, though - so something else is developing the capacity to listen to information that does not go with what one believes. I had to learn that those in political power, for the most part, had utterly no concern for people. Then, if you believe something is an "inside job," you remain unaware of forces beyond the government and various government agencies. But basically I agree: look at the common enemy. In general, use your energy well.
And yet, let's also not be naive. The same forces, powers, money that created the A&ETruth dialectic and did so intentionally ahead of time in order to send us all down a false rabbit hole, are perfectly capable of creating plenty of false "believers" to continue the ruse, creating as much confusion as possible. They know that people don't like to read books, and would rather just "believe" something. A better question might be, why someone like Gage continues to push the dialectic anyway.
I have much to learn about the 9/11, and grateful for the researchers, truth-seekers, and those keen and courageous to step out into the fray and share their mainstream-narrative-busting evidence.
Thank you, for getting some of these 'alternative' voices online during the Truth-Summit 2023, such as Richard Gage and Andrew Johnson.
I must add, though, that I found the behaviour of Andrew Johnson troubling, arrogant, and petulant - repeatedly switching off his video whenever Gage spoke. Whatever truth he has to share (and undoubtedly there is much I and others cam learn about), Johnson does not win me over at all...I find his attitude disrespectful and childish and bolshy. and am now not to easily drawn to anything he may have to share. Perhaps more humility is called for.
DEW - Directed Energy Weapons a playlist of videos and a short history of science fiction that's been available in the real world since the 1970's.
In the 1st video of this playlist, a 1985 CNN investigative report, Lt Col Tom E. Bearden discusses what was captured via satellite in the late 70's and early 80's. He explains "electromagnetic explosions or implosions" from a distance, namely the extraction of energy from a distant point, that looks like a "cold explosion", something the US government was trying to achieve themselves. Strange how much those satellite pics look like satellite pics we saw after what happened on 9/11.
Then in the 2nd video, listen to what Col John Alexander was up to at Los Alamos Labs in 1986, when they asked Hutchison to come and demonstrate his "Hutchison Effect". Notice what he says, with regards to what was observed in their tests in the lab.
Next thing in 1988 the US black op budget grew from $19B to $55B and in 1989, the “Star Wars program” had their first successful test.
The 3rd video discusses, WHY IT COULDN’T be “space beams” used on 9/11.
The 4th video discusses the weaponization of lasers since 1971 and refers to “The Panama Deception” and “Star Wars in Iraq” and more…
The 5th video Jim Fetzer was convinced that some sort of DEW was used on 9/11 in 2007, but today he’d deny it – So, who got to him?
The 6th video - "The Panama Deception" is an Academy Award winning documentary, which discusses the use of experimental energy weapons during the Panama invasion by the US military in 1989.
"Star Wars in Iraq" filmed in 2006, goes into the use of energy weapons on innocent civilians in Iraq by the US military.
The rest of the videos in the playlist will give you a better understanding of DEW - Directed Energy Weapons.
tee-riffic interview session! this one had eluded me (there were so many good 'uns!) but many well-taken points here!--seems that Andrew & Elana might share more brainstormin' too together as both hit some points I hadn't encountered in spite'a bein' a longtime Dr Judy fan.
Jus' addin' too that imo Dr. Judy's angle is by far the best... we lived blocks away from the WTC when it "ALL"went down an' we knew from the git go sumthin' wuzn't right--we endured the strange dust (not normal), watched 'em drive away the "evidence" by the dumpster load (who duz this?), an' knew that that wreckage wuz not from a plane... WTC1 wuz majorly "overbuilt" like the Brooklyn Bridge!
It's SOoooo important to git ta the bottom of 9/11, I'd say ASAP as the wagons are circlin' now. As I write this, they're buryin' the "international group-effort" story by (mis)directing the whole "op" laser pointer right inta' Mossad/Israel's ball court--an'other "oswald acted alone" scenario --with the SAME dang cast of characters (that too wuz a group-op).
IF the laser pointer absolves the USA / 5 Eyes of nearly-all wrong doin' an sez "it's exclusively an' Israeli-led OP" (so let Iran blow Israel up--they're callin' fer that..) THEN the entire DEW argue-mint vanishes. It's happenin' now.
Israel "soitenly" played their dastardly role but Israel doesn't have EITHER Haarp or DEWs. 10/7 might be their 9/11 but the DEWs are red-white-an'-BLEW!
Mebbe it's time fer an'uther meetin' of these same minds on the 9/11 topic (still hopin' they'll free Reiner soon) given what's been added today via this hot war in the Middle East--an' also given a year more of far more overt weather warfare, etc--...but perhaps on this new drive 'round it's best to not be "enGage'in' " that one gear that goes "in reverse?"--if I'm makin' sense? anywhoo, this wuz GREAT!
Thank you, Roger, for your extensive comment. As I know more of the history - of Richard Gage's denigrating comments re Judy Wood's research - I probably could better understand Andrew Johnson's attitude. Some of Richard Gage's dismissive remarks in fact occurred during the panel, when he called the findings of Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson something like fairy tales.
On the other hand, we are all aware of the way the majority of people have a similar attitude to facts regarding the injections - somehow their minds have been closed to receiving accurate information regarding the injections.
All the same, I have encouraged Andrew to focus on his information - the facts he is presenting - and not pay attention to Richard and his claims. Likewise I encourage people aware of the dangers of the injections not to get involved countering charges of, say, being conspiracy theorists.
This can be difficult, however, when one has lived through extensive personal attacks, as Andrew Johnson has, as he chronicles in one of his books on 9/11. The book is free for you to download from his site. Perhaps it would make you more sympathetic to his situation. Here is the link: https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/product-category/book/
Thank you for your awesome Truth Summit and for getting Andrew and Richard on a live podcast.
I suggest listening to the whole podcast, as it will show you how Richard Gage has not covered all the strange evidence of 9/11.
A great truth bomb by Andrew Johnson at the 1h mark, but I state again, you need to listen to the whole discussion.
Also important is to listen to the following;
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich conducts an exclusive interview with Barrie Trower, one of the best-known experts in the field of microwave radiation and frequencies, which have been researched and used as weapons in intelligence agencies since the early 1940s.
Hi Cliff, Excellent that you broke with Richard Gage almost 20 years ago. Then, I'm not sure exactly who is behind 9/11. The first question for me (like for Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson): what is the evidence regarding what happened? For that, I have been impressed by the work and writings of Dr Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson. It sounds like you have reached similar conclusions regarding what was done.
The controlled demolition of thermite being used on the Towers during the September 11, 2001 attacks.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite?sd=pf
Thanks. I'll watch/listen in.
Hi, all, I have sent Elsa this powerful 4-page critical response regarding the discredited theory of the destruction of the World Trade Center by directed energy weapons, but it doesn’t appear that she read it. I hope you will:
https://richardgage911.org/wp-content/uploads/AE911Truths-Position-on-Directed-Energy-Weapon-DEW-Hypothesis-by-Jonathan-Cole-Richard-Gage-and-Gregg-Roberts.pdf
Of course, there are directed energy weapons. But there is absolutely no evidence, including in the book by Judy Wood, that the towers were destroyed by it. Read the above paper if you want to understand why I refer to the DEW hypothesis, as “fantasy“.
This documentary that I made at AE911Truth, from beginning to end, for a detailed, factual, accounting of the forensic evidence of high energy, explosives, extreme heat, and nanothermite incendiaries, and how exactly they account for the towers’ destruction. Judy Wood, on page 126 and surrounding pages of her book, specifically denies each of the above points of evidence, even though they are irrefutable an overwhelming. Given that, there is plenty of reason to suspect her intentions. Follow the evidence, not the fantasy:
https://youtu.be/Ddz2mw2vaEg
Whoops! I sent the above reply on my wife’s phone, lol. She’ll forgive me. But know at least I am the one who wrote the comment. :)
The controlled demolition of thermite being used on the Towers during the September 11, 2001 attacks.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite?sd=pf
Oh, Elsa, I so appreciate, not only the Truth Summit that you initiated and conducted, but also this message you now posted. I completely understand what your experience has been and I find myself completely aligned with what you're saying.
As I mentioned before, your interview with Andrew Johnson was amazing for me to hear; eye-opening and life-changing.
I hope many people become aware of the evidence of directed free-energy technology.
Thank you so much again!!
If I may post two items that I've since connected (indirectly) to Dr. Judy Wood's research. That would be this about the recent earthquake in Turkey:
https://reinettesenumsfoghornexpress.substack.com/p/unequivocal-evidence-of-our-ability?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
And this man's experience working as a contractor for Raytheon at the South Pole ( one must get through the beginning of his presentation to arrive at the importance of what he reveals)
https://youtu.be/jx19Pgo2DFU
Pamela
You might find this article and link to various video's on DEW - (Directed Energy Weapons), which have been in use for decades interesting as well.
https://911revision.substack.com/p/steven-greers-disclosure-and-energy
Thank you for your comment - and also for the extra links you have included.
My take on the 2 men is that they need to remember that we are fighting a common enemy. That even though their "truths" are vastly different there is a common truth! The official narrative as a lie.
Agreed. The energy is better directed at the common enemy. The facts do matter, though - so something else is developing the capacity to listen to information that does not go with what one believes. I had to learn that those in political power, for the most part, had utterly no concern for people. Then, if you believe something is an "inside job," you remain unaware of forces beyond the government and various government agencies. But basically I agree: look at the common enemy. In general, use your energy well.
And yet, let's also not be naive. The same forces, powers, money that created the A&ETruth dialectic and did so intentionally ahead of time in order to send us all down a false rabbit hole, are perfectly capable of creating plenty of false "believers" to continue the ruse, creating as much confusion as possible. They know that people don't like to read books, and would rather just "believe" something. A better question might be, why someone like Gage continues to push the dialectic anyway.
AGREED.
I have much to learn about the 9/11, and grateful for the researchers, truth-seekers, and those keen and courageous to step out into the fray and share their mainstream-narrative-busting evidence.
Thank you, for getting some of these 'alternative' voices online during the Truth-Summit 2023, such as Richard Gage and Andrew Johnson.
I must add, though, that I found the behaviour of Andrew Johnson troubling, arrogant, and petulant - repeatedly switching off his video whenever Gage spoke. Whatever truth he has to share (and undoubtedly there is much I and others cam learn about), Johnson does not win me over at all...I find his attitude disrespectful and childish and bolshy. and am now not to easily drawn to anything he may have to share. Perhaps more humility is called for.
You might just find this playlist on DEW (Directed Energy Weapons) rather interesting....
https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/DEW---Directed-Energy-Weapons:5
DEW - Directed Energy Weapons a playlist of videos and a short history of science fiction that's been available in the real world since the 1970's.
In the 1st video of this playlist, a 1985 CNN investigative report, Lt Col Tom E. Bearden discusses what was captured via satellite in the late 70's and early 80's. He explains "electromagnetic explosions or implosions" from a distance, namely the extraction of energy from a distant point, that looks like a "cold explosion", something the US government was trying to achieve themselves. Strange how much those satellite pics look like satellite pics we saw after what happened on 9/11.
Then in the 2nd video, listen to what Col John Alexander was up to at Los Alamos Labs in 1986, when they asked Hutchison to come and demonstrate his "Hutchison Effect". Notice what he says, with regards to what was observed in their tests in the lab.
Next thing in 1988 the US black op budget grew from $19B to $55B and in 1989, the “Star Wars program” had their first successful test.
The 3rd video discusses, WHY IT COULDN’T be “space beams” used on 9/11.
The 4th video discusses the weaponization of lasers since 1971 and refers to “The Panama Deception” and “Star Wars in Iraq” and more…
The 5th video Jim Fetzer was convinced that some sort of DEW was used on 9/11 in 2007, but today he’d deny it – So, who got to him?
The 6th video - "The Panama Deception" is an Academy Award winning documentary, which discusses the use of experimental energy weapons during the Panama invasion by the US military in 1989.
"Star Wars in Iraq" filmed in 2006, goes into the use of energy weapons on innocent civilians in Iraq by the US military.
The rest of the videos in the playlist will give you a better understanding of DEW - Directed Energy Weapons.
Excellent!
tee-riffic interview session! this one had eluded me (there were so many good 'uns!) but many well-taken points here!--seems that Andrew & Elana might share more brainstormin' too together as both hit some points I hadn't encountered in spite'a bein' a longtime Dr Judy fan.
Jus' addin' too that imo Dr. Judy's angle is by far the best... we lived blocks away from the WTC when it "ALL"went down an' we knew from the git go sumthin' wuzn't right--we endured the strange dust (not normal), watched 'em drive away the "evidence" by the dumpster load (who duz this?), an' knew that that wreckage wuz not from a plane... WTC1 wuz majorly "overbuilt" like the Brooklyn Bridge!
It's SOoooo important to git ta the bottom of 9/11, I'd say ASAP as the wagons are circlin' now. As I write this, they're buryin' the "international group-effort" story by (mis)directing the whole "op" laser pointer right inta' Mossad/Israel's ball court--an'other "oswald acted alone" scenario --with the SAME dang cast of characters (that too wuz a group-op).
IF the laser pointer absolves the USA / 5 Eyes of nearly-all wrong doin' an sez "it's exclusively an' Israeli-led OP" (so let Iran blow Israel up--they're callin' fer that..) THEN the entire DEW argue-mint vanishes. It's happenin' now.
Israel "soitenly" played their dastardly role but Israel doesn't have EITHER Haarp or DEWs. 10/7 might be their 9/11 but the DEWs are red-white-an'-BLEW!
Mebbe it's time fer an'uther meetin' of these same minds on the 9/11 topic (still hopin' they'll free Reiner soon) given what's been added today via this hot war in the Middle East--an' also given a year more of far more overt weather warfare, etc--...but perhaps on this new drive 'round it's best to not be "enGage'in' " that one gear that goes "in reverse?"--if I'm makin' sense? anywhoo, this wuz GREAT!
Thank you, Roger, for your extensive comment. As I know more of the history - of Richard Gage's denigrating comments re Judy Wood's research - I probably could better understand Andrew Johnson's attitude. Some of Richard Gage's dismissive remarks in fact occurred during the panel, when he called the findings of Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson something like fairy tales.
On the other hand, we are all aware of the way the majority of people have a similar attitude to facts regarding the injections - somehow their minds have been closed to receiving accurate information regarding the injections.
All the same, I have encouraged Andrew to focus on his information - the facts he is presenting - and not pay attention to Richard and his claims. Likewise I encourage people aware of the dangers of the injections not to get involved countering charges of, say, being conspiracy theorists.
This can be difficult, however, when one has lived through extensive personal attacks, as Andrew Johnson has, as he chronicles in one of his books on 9/11. The book is free for you to download from his site. Perhaps it would make you more sympathetic to his situation. Here is the link: https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/product-category/book/
Thanks for the link, Elsa which I will check out.
Best wishes.
Thank you for your awesome Truth Summit and for getting Andrew and Richard on a live podcast.
I suggest listening to the whole podcast, as it will show you how Richard Gage has not covered all the strange evidence of 9/11.
A great truth bomb by Andrew Johnson at the 1h mark, but I state again, you need to listen to the whole discussion.
Also important is to listen to the following;
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich conducts an exclusive interview with Barrie Trower, one of the best-known experts in the field of microwave radiation and frequencies, which have been researched and used as weapons in intelligence agencies since the early 1940s.
Part 1 -
https://video.icic.law/w/qZp85kgJKC9pLrmruXkPRY
Part 2 -
https://video.icic.law/w/xdc29PqSfLoSczgcE9av7R
I've listened to the Barrie Trower interviews - which are also on Maria Zeee's site. Very valuable information.
I definitely agree with your assessment.
Hi Cliff, Excellent that you broke with Richard Gage almost 20 years ago. Then, I'm not sure exactly who is behind 9/11. The first question for me (like for Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson): what is the evidence regarding what happened? For that, I have been impressed by the work and writings of Dr Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson. It sounds like you have reached similar conclusions regarding what was done.